On Black Crime; A Media That Won’t Report It; The Logic of a Comfortable Majority; and Reasonable Segregation

Note: I cleaned up the section on segregation. I corrected where I had written society when I meant civilization and restructured a couple of sentences for clarification.

———————-

On July 10th, three black thugs, in the course of playing a “knockout game,”  murdered a 62-year-old Chicago man. The rules of this ghetto game are simple: the first one to knock unconscious an unsuspecting victim is the ”winner.” The victim, Delfino Mora, sucker-punched and left unconscious, later died from the blow to his head. There have been at least two other people murdered and several injured in this same type of attack over the past couple of years. As is often the case with these black miscreants, they recorded the attack on a cellphone and (idiotically) posted it on their own Facebook page. No doubt, a trio of future rocket scientists who only took wrong paths in life. Who knows to what heights they might have soared had white people cared more about them and invested more tax money in their futures.

From the Chicago Sun Times:

Malik Jones, 16, Nicholas Ayala, 17, and Anthony Malcolm, 18, were caught after the video of Jones fatally punching Delfino Mora was posted on Jones’ Facebook page, according to authorities.

The three were playing a “game where the offender picks an innocent victim and knocks him out by striking him and likely robbing him as well,” Assistant Cook County State’s Attorney Terry Clancy told Judge Israel Desierto in court Monday.

 ————————-

What would be the national media’s reaction were these thugs white? What would they say if, in the course of a knock-out-the-victim “game,” three white savages violently attacked a 62-year-old black man? These questions are oft-used clichés but they are also questions that everyone can answer correctly. The answer is that the national media’s reaction would be to immediately deploy wall to wall coverage. If there is a crime of this nature, the scenario preferred by the Left would be that rare event, that Holy Grail of the liberal journalist; the white-on-black violent crime. However, as long as the perpetrators were white, even repeated attacks on only white victims during such an insidious ”game” would get decent coverage.

By not covering these crimes, the national media is failing in one of its primary duties, which is to inform the nation on situations that are harmful and dangerous. Considering that black-perpetrated violent interracial crime (black perpetrator/non-black victim) is common enough to warrant extreme caution in cities containing any measurable black population, it is obvious that the media prefers to risk the lives of innocent people rather than report these crimes. Check the major news outlets for a few days to see if the national media covers this outrageous crime, but they’ll likely hold form and once again push it down the memory hole where it will forever remain.

The reason the Left doesn’t properly report these crimes is because they believe that black violence is ultimately the fault of the white racist society in which we live. Therefore, white people are never victims in the purest sense. As the Left perceives it, white people fall victim to violent black crime because all whites (except, of course, those whites on the Left) are co-conspirators in an evil racist white society bent on denying equality to all non-white people. (In fact, the Left views white, Western society as something that, by design is suppressive of the rights of everyone who is not white, Christian and heterosexual, or who agree with the Left’s ideology.)

The Left believes that the so-called denial of equality by white society creates black criminals and causes them to strike out at white people. Therefore, the Left’s compassion for whites as victims of violent black-on-white crimes is tempered by their anger toward all non-Left whites as enablers of white privilege and racism. The Left is aware that non-whites are often victims of black violence. Nonetheless, they believe that the white racism toward blacks so permeates Western society that the media should not bring too much notice to non-white victims of black violence (other than homosexuals). The Left believes that were the national media to pay too much attention to non-black victims of violent black crime it would serve only to bring about more discrimination against blacks.

One must ask: Would dramatically increased levels of extreme violent black crime change the Left’s approach to reporting black criminality? The answer: not likely. Most leftists are dedicated believers in the notion that every black problem has a white cause. Expecting someone on the Left to change their perspective would not be completely unrealistic but it would be akin to betting on a long shot. Much like winning big at a casino roulette table, it happens; just not very often.

That explains some of the Left’s reasoning for their coverupage of black violence, but what of the members of the media on the Right? Why do they not properly report on black violence in general and black-on-white crimes in particular? The answer is two-fold. Some are understandably unwilling to risk their careers (as are regular citizens who see but do not comment vociferously on these violent black-on-white-crimes). Others on the Right, liberals who erroneously refer to themselves as conservatives (again, this includes citizens who are not part of the media), are in basic agreement with the Left concerning several issues, not the least of which is black crime. These Right liberals believe, as does the Left, that the high level of violent black crime exists because white America does not do enough to close the educational and economic divide between whites and blacks. They also agree with the Left that white society doesn’t properly counter the black “gangsta” culture, although, like the Left, the Right liberals have no reasonable suggestions on just how white people can accomplish that.

These “conservatives” may not admit it in the same way that the Leftist does, but they are essentially saying the same thing: We need to do more to provide black people with a better education and to discourage them from adhering to destructive lifestyles, including the “gangsta” lifestyle. The Right liberals believe, as does the Left, that if we can just make black people act more like white people, that will ”fix” the problems facing black society and their level of violence will naturally decline until it equals that of white society. This type of condescension is an irritating form of prejudice, for it assumes that an adult is like a child who cannot survive without the condescending party’s wise counsel. No one could blame an honest black man for wanting nothing to do with white people after he has witnessed this condescending attitude of white liberals,.

Separate but Happy

Some form of legal segregation is the most obvious solution to America’s (and the West’s) racial problems; whether these problems are the result of the high level of violent black crime, or the result of difficulties which arise naturally due to our racial differences. Each race should, as much as possible, guide their own lives and be the sole deciders of their own fates. This is not to say that a handful of white people can’t live amongst blacks, or that a few black people can’t live amongst whites. However, to have more cohesive civilizations and to reduce problems caused by racial differences, each race should maintain a comfortable-majority of 85 percent or more in its respective civilization. Within the civilizations would be somewhat separate societies (the word, “communities,” a liberal favorite, just doesn’t seem to fit here) where some segregation would be allowed. Each society could decide on its level of segregation. Government facilities would be open to all people but everything thing else the people could decide amongst themselves.

One advantage for white people in a segregated civilization would be the ability to minimize the black criminal’s access to white people, thereby making white cities and neighborhoods considerably safer. This advantage would also benefit all non-blacks who currently live in areas with a black crime problem. As a result, black misbehavior and black violent crime would no longer destroy non-black cities and neighborhoods by forcing non-black citizens to constantly relocate to safer (non-black) areas. The advantage to blacks would be that they would be the rulers of their own societies, deciding amongst themselves how their societies should function.

Segregated or not, the major advantage of a majority white, Anglo/European civilization would be its ability to maintain its own culture, as opposed to having its cultural traditions diluted by large groups of non-white, non-Anglo/European immigrants. White cities would in short order reflect once again their Anglo/European culture; not a Mexican culture, an Indian culture, an Asian culture, an African culture; etc. The alternative to a civilization where one race is 85 percent or more of the population (a comfortable majority) is one where there is a constant struggle for power between the races; a struggle that is a natural result when lacking a dominant racial majority. Forcing the people of a civilization to relinquish their dominant majority status is no way to build a happy, healthy society and it is a recipe for constant discontent.

Reasonable segregation within a comfortable-majority civilization would force each race of people living within these civilizations to solve their own problems and either reap the rewards of a succesful functional society, or suffer the problems that accompany a failed and dysfunctional society.